SOVEREIGNTY OF VIET NAM OVER THE HOANG SA ARCHIPELAGO
The Socialist Republic of Viet Nam rejects
as completely unfounded, in fact and in law, Chinaâ€™s sovereignty claims over
the Hoang Sa archipelago (which China calls â€œthe Xisha islandsâ€, also known as
the Paracel Islands) in the annexes to the letters dated 22 May 2014 and 09
June 2014 from the ChargÃ© dâ€™affaires a.i.
of the Permanent Mission of the Peopleâ€™s Republic of China to the United
Nations addressed to the Secretary-General of the United Nations as contained
in documents A/68/887 and A/68/907
respectively. Viet Nam affirms that the Chinese claims have no legal or historical
Historical documents are not in accord with Chinaâ€™s claims
of sovereignty over the Hoang Sa archipelago (Paracel Islands)
China has, in its recent
communications, referred to some documents as historical evidence to assert the
so-called â€œsovereigntyâ€ of China over the Hoang Sa archipelago of Viet Nam.
However, these â€œdocumentsâ€ cannot be authenticated,
lack accuracy and have been interpreted by China in an arbitrary fashion. The
documents referred to by China do not by any means prove that China established
sovereignty over the Hoang Sa archipelago when this territory was terra nullius. Historical records, by
contrast, show that China understood that its sovereignty did not extend to the
Hoang Sa archipelago.
For example, in the last decade of the 19th century when the ships Bellona and UmejiMaru sank in the Hoang Sa
archipelago and were looted by Chinese fishermen, the Chinese authorities of
Guangdong Province of China argued that the Hoang Sa archipelago was abandoned
islands which did not belong to China. The archipelago neither was administratively attached to any district
of Hainan of China nor fell under the responsibility of any Chinese authority.
China, on these grounds, refused to take responsibility for the incident.
Viet Nam has publicly provided authentic historical materials proving that Viet
Nam established its sovereignty over the Hoang Sa archipelago when the islands
were terra nullius. Since at least the 17th century, the
Nguyen dynasties of Viet Nam organized activities to exploit resources on
islands of the Hoang Sa archipelago, undertook maritime measurements and
recorded navigation routes to ensure the safety of navigation by foreign
vessels through the waters of Hoang Sa archipelago. These activities were well recorded
in official documents issued by the Vietnamese dynasties, which are still archived
in Viet Nam.
After France and
Viet Nam had signed the Protectorate Treaties of 15 March 1874 and 06 June 1884
respectively, France, on behalf of Viet Nam, continuously exercised Viet Namâ€™s
sovereignty over the Hoang Sa archipelago and protested against Chinaâ€™s
infringements. France conducted many activities to exercise sovereignty over
the Hoang Sa archipelago, including building and operating lighthouses and meteorological
stations, establishing administrative delegations responsible for the
archipelago attached to Thua Thien province (Annam), and granting birth
certificates to Vietnamese citizens born in the archipelago. In 1909, the exploratory
mission conducted by Commander Li Zhun of Guangdong of China violated the
sovereignty well established by Viet Nam over the Hoang Sa archipelago and
effectively exercised by France on behalf of Viet Nam. France, on behalf of
Viet Nam, protested against Chinaâ€™s intrusions upon the Hoang Sa archipelago
and reaffirmed that sovereignty over the Hoang Sa archipelago was well
established by Viet Nam. In response to China's claims over the Hoang Sa
archipelago, France requested China to resolve the issue by international
arbitration (French Note Verbal dated 18 February 1937 addressed to China), but
In 1946, the Republic of China
under Chiang Kai-shek, taking advantage of the situation at the end of the
Second World War, illegally intruded upon Phu Lam (Woody) Island of the Hoang
Sa archipelago. In 1947, France protested against this illegal intrusion and
requested that the two parties negotiate and settle the issue through third
party adjudication, which the Republic of China again refused. The Chiang Kai-shek
regime later withdrew from Woody Island.
conferences did not transfer the Hoang Sa archipelago to China
Before and after the end of the Second World War, the issue of
sovereignty over the Hoang Sa archipelago was put on the agenda of a number of
international conferences. The Cairo Conference held between 22 - 26 November
1943, with the attendance of U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt, British
Prime Minister Winston Churchill and Republic of China President Chiang
Kai-shek, adopted the Cairo CommuniquÃ© aimed at eliminating Japanese
administration over all Asia-Pacific islands seized by Japan since the First
World War in 1914 and returning to China Chinese territories under Japanese
occupation, including Manju, Taiwan and Penghu. Chiang Kai-shek who represented
China at the Conference said nothing about the Hoang Sa and Truong Sa
The Potsdam Conference from 17 July
to 2 August 1945 with the attendance of the leaders of the U.S., Great Britain
and China issued the Potsdam Declaration reaffirming the Cairo CommuniquÃ©.
Chiang Kai-shek, the representative of China at the Conference, again made no
mention whatsoever of the Hoang Sa and Truong Sa archipelagoes.
The San Francisco Peace Conference on
4 - 8 September 1951 was attended by representatives of 51 countries, including
Viet Nam as a member of the French Union. The Prime Minister of the State of Viet
Nam Tran Van Huu participated in the conference as Head of the Vietnamese
Delegation. The Conference addressed the issue of devolution of a number of
territories in the Asia Pacific region. At the Conference, the Head of
Delegation of the Soviet Union, Mr. Andrei A. Gromyko, put forwards a proposal
on behalf of China containing 13 items, among which was Japan's recognition of
the sovereignty of the People's Republic of China over some islands in the East
Sea (South China Sea), including the Hoang Sa archipelago. With 46 votes
against, 3 votes in favour and 2 abstentions, the Conference rejected the proposal
by the Delegation of the Soviet Union.
Immediately after that vote, on 7
September 1951, addressing the Conference, the Head of the Vietnamese
Delegation Mr. Tran Van Huu reaffirmed Viet Nam's long standing sovereignty
over the Hoang Sa and Truong Sa archipelagoes. None of the 51 participating
countries protested against that confirmation by the Vietnamese Delegation of Viet
Namâ€™s sovereignty over these archipelagoes.
The Geneva Conference in 1954 on
the restoration of peace in Indochina stated that the parties concerned would
respect the independence and territorial integrity of Viet Nam, which included
the Hoang Sa and Truong Sa archipelagoes then under the administration of
French and Vietnamese forces. Having been a participant at the Geneva
Conference, China is well aware of this fact and must respect the international
instruments adopted at the Conference.
Article 1 of the Paris Agreement in
1973 clearly stated that all countries must respect the independence and
territorial integrity of Viet Nam. At that time, the Hoang Sa and Truong Sa
archipelagoes were under the administration of the Republic of Viet Nam and
constituted an integral part of Vietnamese territory.
In January 1974, China used
military force to occupy the entire Hoang Sa archipelago. The Governments of
the Republic of Viet Nam and the Provisional Revolutionary Government of South
Viet Nam issued statements to express their position and protest against
China's action. The Government of the Republic of Viet Nam requested the United
Nations Security Council to hold an urgent meeting on China's use of force.
Under the international law of territorial acquisition, the use of force to
occupy a territory cannot create territorial title.
violated the principle of refraining from the threat or use of force under
international law and therefore could not establish sovereignty over the Hoang
invaded the Hoang Sa archipelago twice. Taking advantage of the withdrawal of
France from Viet Nam, in 1956 China invaded and occupied the eastern part of
the Hoang Sa archipelago. This was the first ever standing occupation of China anywhere
in the Hoang Sa archipelago which elicited strong protests from the Republic of
Viet Nam. In 1959, an attempt to land on the western part of the archipelago
made by Chinese soldiers disguised as fishermen was smashed by the forces of
the Republic of Viet Nam. Eighty-two Chinese "fishermen" were captured.
Both these invasions occurred after the sovereignty of Viet Nam over the Hoang
Sa and Truong Sa archipelagoes had been reaffirmed, without any protest, at the
above-mentioned international conferences. In 1974, taking advantage of the war
in Viet Nam, China attacked and seized control over the Hoang Sa archipelago from
the Government of the Republic of Viet Nam. This was the first time ever that
China obtained full occupation of the Hoang Sa archipelago by force.
Under international law, the use of
force to occupy the territory of another sovereign state is null and void and can
never be the basis for a claim of sovereignty. Viet Namâ€™s sovereignty over the
Hoang Sa archipelago therefore continues and is not displaced by Chinaâ€™s
occupation by force.
of China on 12 May 1988, an official document of the Chinese Ministry of
Foreign Affairs, also clearly asserted the principle of international law that
"aggression cannot award sovereignty" over a territory. No country in
the world recognizes China as sovereign over the Hoang Sa archipelago.
Nam has never recognized Chinaâ€™s sovereignty over the Hoang Sa archipelago
China has deliberately distorted
and misinterpreted history when it refers to the letter signed by late Prime
Minister Pham Van Dong in 1958 and other materials and publications published
in Viet Nam before 1975 in attempts to support its claims over the Hoang Sa archipelago.
The letter made no mention at all of sovereignty over the Hoang Sa and Truong
Sa archipelagoes. The letter concerned maritime entitlements, not territorial
issues. In fact, the conclusions that China would draw today from the letter
are contradicted by China's own statements, including statement by Chinese
Leader Deng Xiao Ping himself.
1975, 17 years after the release of the letter by the late Prime Minister Pham
Van Dong, Chinese Leader Deng Xiao Ping told Vietnamese Leader Le Duan in
Beijing that "China has sufficient materials to prove that the Xisha
islands (Hoang Sa) and Nansha islands (Truong Sa) have been part of China's
territory since long ago. However, in line with the principle of friendly
consultation to resolve differences, the two countries will discuss with each
other to address this issue later". Deng Xiao Pingâ€™s statement was well noted
in Chinaâ€™s Ministry of Foreign Affairs Memorandum dated 12 May 1988 and
reflects Chinaâ€™s understanding that sovereignty was not settled in favour of
China by any previous statement or agreement. Viet Nam requests that China
respect this historical fact and seriously engage in negotiations with Viet Nam
in respect of the Hoang Sa archipelago.